Now we get to another of phylo-roadking's masterpieces. I told you tha bloke was good - he saw something none of the rest of us did...
Look at "Sunday Kazas' review...
"Worse than apathetic response to human suffering, his (and the Reich's) was self-righteously justified extermination. Though Mr. Schiller explains that the Reich was not a band of sadists, who could agree with him?"
A.Levy's...
"the unfeeling and businesslike approach of the Reich."
"This book is truly a goldmine of personal inside information about the Reich."
Cathy's?...
"the downward avalanche of the Reich's collapse"
Notice anything??? Paul Harker almost NEVER uses the word "Nazi". Susna's is the ONLY review uses the word - ONCE - and when i first read "her"review it certainly didn't...Paul K. Wanker edited it in AFTER phylo-roadking picked up on that on Feldgrau!!!
HE NEVER USES THE TERM "NAZI GERMANY"...
By the way - JUST before we leave....do you notice anything odd about A.Levy's review???
"The investigate research of Mr. Easley and Mr. Hart lend exceptional and verifiable credibility to this work"
What the fuck? This bloke is quoting a PROVEN-FAKE "researcher" to give CREDIBILITY???
Strewth! What a Jerkoff!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment