So come on, Paul mate -
Where are those 883 pages of documents proving the existence of Schiller?
Where are the 114 pages of Documents proving the existence of Karl von Metzger?
Who are all these "experts" who have confirmed the existence of Schiller and von Metzger?
...eh? Where are they, Paul?
Not one REAL document, not one experts name IN THREE YEARS...
I'll give you one better than THAT...
Paul K. Harker - your reputation is in the mud; not just personally for the Holocaust Denial and the Apologism, and the Anti-Semitism...not just for the fraudulent and let's face it plain stupid way you used sockpuppets and contradicted yourself so many times...not JUST for your faked careers...but your reputation as an author is six feet under. Tony Munoz was right - the academic fraternity is laughing at these books, and we're all laughing along with them. You haven't been able to prove one single shred of anything between those two sets of covers.
But do you know what's WORSE than not providing them??? All those hundreds of pages of proofs, all those experts' names???
It's the REFUSING to do it. It's not neglecting to, or ignoring the requests - SO many times over the years you've been asked to front up and show us what you PRETEND you have AND YOU HAVE REFUSED. You can't plead ignorance - you were asked to by SO many people on SO many occasions - and you REFUSED. You run away from every test, every chance - ha! - offered to you...
EXCEPT ONE RIDICULOUS FORGERY.
And YOU know why - just as well as WE do...
YOU CAN'T PRODUCE THE GOODS BECAUSE YOU CAN'T PRODUCE WHAT YOU HAVEN'T GOT.
Just like the sockpuppets' NON-EXISTENT fathers, uncles, grandfathers - NONE OF THOSE PROOFS YOU CLAIM YOU HAVE...EXIST.
It's no wonder I bore him...
http://dir19.blogspot.com/2008/08/gibson-bores-me.html
"Gibby bores me with his garbage. I was going to comment on his blog but I realize he's not worth dealing with simply because he can't write three sentences without using some kind of childish cussword. Cusswords are simply noise. Just placeholders without any meaning. And that dictates the rest of his comments. They don't mean anything. Gibby might be taken seriously if his goal was to communicate ideas in a way that is convincing. He needs to be wise about how people hear things. The words he chooses, and his condescending tone, cause readers to throw up their defenses in general because he's failed to be convincing. He should make a grown up effort to put his arguments and words in such a way that people can hear and appreciate them, not in ways that cause them to stop listening or want to leave. But I'm sure he'll learn these techniques once he grows up. Plus it's uncreative. People who use foul language as expressions of whatever they are feeling at the moment forsake far more creative ways to say it. People who use it are limiting themselves to a very small, undesirable portion of all language. People who use it show that they are ignorant enough not to know to use something better. Gibby uses it for shock value and to be heard. He craves attention. Then again it also illustrates the lack of education and life experience this poor person has. Yet he deems himself worthy to be my critic? Whatever. His negative attention seeking behavior bores me."
...it bores him because he's been forced to read and listen to the truth coming back at him from all around the world for three years. It bores him because it's ALL he's been hearing - he hasn't heard ONE SINGLE WORD of praise - except what he makes up himself and posts across the Internet via his sockpuppets. He hasn't heard it...
...because NOONE will EVER praise a lie.
And oh just look! All said without one single swear word too! I've betrayed my national stereotype!!!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment